Never Send The Slides
While death by PowerPoint has been a much-talked-about phenomenon for decades, collaborative slideware and AI have elevated slideuments, Frankendecks and the resulting poor presentations to epidemic proportions. This article introduces a new series focussing on how knowledge workers can make effective presentations.
08 September 2026
Contents
My co-lead asked me to send the slides. I refused.
A few years ago, I led an engineering transformation for one of Thoughtworks’ clients. You know the familiar trope about consultants — our deliverable is often a presentation. Thoughtworks consultants, of course, do far more work than that, but as the engagement lead, I had to present the results of our work to our client sponsor.
So, we pieced together an impressive story and an impactful set of visuals to support our narrative. The meeting was the day after, and the norm was to “send the slides” to our client so they could “pre-read” the content. I refused to do so because our slides weren’t readable. Much of the content would come from the spoken word. Without the presenter, there would be no presentation. We didn’t send the slides. At the time, my colleagues may have been unconvinced by my reasoning.
To cut a long story short, the presentation went even better than I’d expected. Our decision to hold back the slide deck allowed us to introduce information in sync with our narrative. We could orchestrate the emotions in the room and retain a sense of intrigue. We could hold back data for the moment when it’d have the most impact. The client was thrilled with what we’d achieved, mostly because we’d done a great job, but partly because we told our story in an impactful way.
The story of that presentation went viral at Thoughtworks for a short while. I remember presenting different versions to leadership and transformation groups, and even writing up lessons learned so others could replicate our success. And then we went back to the status quo of sending slides as pre-reads. I couldn’t change a thing at my company. To this day, though, I never send the slides. Never in advance, for sure.
Slides for presenting; documents for reading
Slides are slides. Documents are documents. They aren't the same thing. Attempts to merge them result in what I call the “slideument”
(slide + document = slideument).-- Garr Reynolds
The practice of “sending slides” has its roots in creating slideuments. Knowledge workers are always short on time. Slides are already a ubiquitous artefact in boardrooms and Zoom meetings. So, why not create one artefact that you can present, and your audience can read?
While I empathise with the lack of time and understand the intent behind creating slideuments, these artefacts are neither good presentations nor good documents. Research on computer-based training dating back to 1998 and 2004 shows that reading while we listen hurts our comprehension. Any good document needs complete sentences, perhaps paragraphs, subheadings, and bullets. By definition, such an artefact can’t be an effective visual aid for presentations.
Moreover, slides don’t lend themselves to good writing.
- First, these tools don’t always come with modern writing aids, such as spelling, grammar and style checkers. For inexperienced writers, this is a bit like driving a stick shift, when you’re better off with a forgiving automatic.
- Second, it’s not productive to fit the slide format. How do you squeeze your writing onto one slide? How do you slice information between slides? How do you lay out elements on a slide, in a visually appealing manner? All these decisions add to the cognitive load of writing, which in itself is a thinking process. Whether it’s the more modern 12:5 ratio or the 16:9 HD ratio, or the old-school 3:2 or 4:3 ratio, the constraint of fitting text to slides doesn’t always add value to your writing.
- Last, since the legacy of slideuments is in creating dual-purpose artefacts, it promotes poor writing. Sentences are incomplete. We leave words unsaid because we plan to voice them when we present. With all of that unspoken context, these artefacts are tough to understand.
Angela Garber coined the term “death by PowerPoint” in a 2001 article in the Small Business Computing magazine. In that article, she quotes Rick Linder, of Linder Management Consultants, who says, “You’re the star, not the slides.” Effective slides complement the story you’re telling. If your audience is reading ahead of your narrative, or is stuck on a previous segment while you’ve moved on, you’re letting the slides take centre stage instead of you.
Collaborative tools and AI amplify poor habits.
Frankendeck: a bloated slideshow built by combining recycled slides and disconnected data with some fresh visuals.
In the corporate world, we treat collaboration as an unqualified good. Surely, collaborating on a presentation is a good thing. I agree, as long as we don’t equate the presentation (i.e. the human presenter with or without slides) with the slides. Since we don’t appreciate this nuance, most corporate presentations begin with a shared Google Slides or PowerPoint file. Requests to collaborate often begin with “Do you have a slide for…” or “Can you add a one-pager about…?” That collection of slides, some canned and some new, leads to what I call a Frankendeck: a bloated slideshow built by combining recycled slides and disconnected data with some fresh visuals. It’s often a product of collaborative, web-based editing.
AI exacerbates this problem. Sturgeon's law states, “Ninety per cent of everything is crap”. AI grounds itself in all-pervasive, death-by-PowerPoint antipatterns, and produces more of the same. When we don’t know what we don’t know about effective presentations and visual storytelling, AI amplifies the impact of our bad habits. No amount of hitting “Enhance this slide” or “Help me visualise” on Google Slides will rescue the broken story of a Frankendeck.
How to never send the slides
We could all do with better presentations, more engaging stories, and fewer slideuments and Frankendecks at work. So, I’m starting a series of articles focused on visual storytelling at work. I’ll write about all the steps that go into an effective presentation — preparation, design and delivery. I’ll help you decide when a document is good enough and how to choose between a live, recorded or in-person presentation. We’ll discuss how to deliver effective online presentations and how to create cinematic presentations using simple tools. And yes, I’ll address the elephant in the room — how you can use AI as an assistant without surrendering your cognition to the machine.
I’m calling this project “Never send the slides.” I promise to be practical and to ground my advice in real-world examples, without beating down strawmen. If you like the sound of that project, watch this space, and you’ll hear from me every so often until I feel like the project’s complete. Good deal? Well then, in the next article, let’s discuss whether you even need a presentation. If you were sending slides until this point, you might learn what to send instead!
Articles in this series
Do you even need a presentation?
08 September 2026
Most of the time, we shouldn't use presentations. If we are just conveying information, then a document is usually enough. If so an infodeck can be an effective layout technique. Recent developments make it easier to use web interactions to make a live document. Recorded video and audio allows the audience to watch and listen at their own time and pace. Live presentations are ideal for situations where you want to convey information while also interacting with people.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to Anuroop Krishnan, Jade Daubney-Bennett, Raghvi Behl, Lubaina Rangwala, Gill Taylor, Santosh Mahale, and Gayathri Moghe for providing feedback for various development versions of this article.
I have used Grammarly to proof read and copy-edit this essay. Claude helped me double-check whether I had addressed all feedback I’d received for this article, either as edits to the original or as ideas for future articles in this series.
Significant Revisions
08 September 2026: Do you even need a presentation? published
08 September 2026: Never Send The Slides published


